Civil and Criminal Litigation

Civil and Criminal Litigation

Overview Our litigation team is adept at representing clients in both civil and criminal matters, striving for justice and favorable outcomes through diligent advocacy.

Case Study We defended a client accused of corporate fraud. Through thorough investigation and strategic litigation, we demonstrated the client’s innocence, resulting in an acquittal and restoration of their professional reputation.

Defending clients against corporate fraud allegations in Nigeria requires a comprehensive understanding of both the legal framework and the intricate dynamics of corporate operations. At Shield and Mace Law, our litigation team is adept at representing clients in both civil and criminal matters, striving for justice and favorable outcomes through diligent advocacy.

Case Study: Defense Against Corporate Fraud Allegations

Background:

Our client, a high-ranking executive in a prominent Nigerian corporation, was accused of corporate fraud involving significant financial discrepancies. The allegations included embezzlement and falsification of financial records, which, if proven, could lead to severe legal penalties and irreparable damage to the client’s professional reputation.

Challenges:

1. Complex Financial Data:
   • The case involved extensive financial records spanning multiple fiscal years, necessitating a thorough forensic analysis to identify inconsistencies and establish a clear narrative.
2. Evidential Burden:
   • In fraud-related litigation, the evidential burden is often cumbersome, requiring the defense to meticulously dissect the prosecution’s claims and present compelling counter-evidence.
     core.ac.uk
3. Public and Media Scrutiny:
   • Given the client’s high-profile status, the case attracted significant media attention, potentially influencing public perception and complicating jury selection.

Our Approach:

1. Comprehensive Investigation:
   • We assembled a multidisciplinary team, including forensic accountants and corporate governance experts, to conduct an exhaustive review of the company’s financial records and internal controls.
   • Identified procedural lapses and potential alternative explanations for the financial discrepancies, thereby challenging the prosecution’s narrative.
2. Strategic Litigation:
   • Developed a defense strategy centered on demonstrating the absence of intent to defraud, a critical element in criminal fraud cases.
   • Highlighted systemic issues within the corporation’s financial management practices that could account for the alleged discrepancies without implicating our client.
3. Reputation Management:
   • Engaged with media consultants to manage public relations, ensuring accurate information dissemination and mitigating potential reputational damage during the trial.
4. Legal Precedents and Framework:
   • Referenced relevant legal precedents and the principles of corporate personality, emphasizing that the actions attributed to the corporation should not be automatically ascribed to individual executives without concrete evidence.
     core.ac.uk

Outcome:

Through meticulous investigation and strategic litigation, we successfully demonstrated that the financial discrepancies resulted from systemic procedural issues rather than intentional fraudulent activities by our client. The court acquitted our client of all charges, leading to the restoration of their professional reputation and the resumption of their career.

Conclusion:

This case underscores the importance of a thorough and strategic approach in defending against corporate fraud allegations. At Shield and Mace Law, we are committed to providing diligent advocacy to achieve justice and favorable outcomes for our clients in both civil and criminal litigation.